Rice v. Brakel, M.D., Center for Neurosciences
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Chief Judge.
¶ 1 Appellants Jay and Betty Rice appeal from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Arlo Brakel and the Center for Neurosciences. On appeal, they argue that the court erred in dismissing their claim for medical battery and that genuine disputes of material fact exist with respect to their negligent supervision, medical malpractice, and contract claims. Because we find no error, we affirm.
Factual and Procedural Background
¶ 2 “We view the facts and the inferences to be drawn from those facts in the light most favorable to the party against whom…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Cobbs v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Seisinger v. SiebelArizona Supreme Court · 2009
- Tucson Medical Center, Incorporated v. MisevchArizona Supreme Court · 1976
- Duncan v. Scottsdale Medical Imaging, Ltd.Arizona Supreme Court · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Leibel v. City of BuckeyeDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2019
- Conklin v. MedtronicCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
- Best v. NieblasCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
- Darren Karr v. Jennifer Maitra, et al.District Court, D. Arizona · 2025
- Derrith Watchman-Moore, et al. v. United States of America, et al.District Court, D. Arizona · 2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.