Derrith Watchman-Moore, et al. v. United States of America, et al.
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Derrith Watchman-Moore, et al., No. CV-17-08187-PCT-BSB 10 Plaintiffs, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 11 v. 12 United States of America, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 The United States of America (“Defendant” or “the government”) has filed a 16 partial motion to dismiss pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and (6) of the Federal Rules of Civil 17 Procedure. (Doc. 11.) Plaintiffs have filed a response to the motion and a motion for 18 leave to amend. (Doc. 17.) As set forth below, the Court recommends that the partial 19 motion…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Jose Francisco Reyna-Tapia, AKA Jose ReynaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.