Legal Opinion

Derrith Watchman-Moore, et al. v. United States of America, et al.

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided April 13, 2018No. 3:17-cv-08187Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Derrith Watchman-Moore, et al., No. CV-17-08187-PCT-BSB 10 Plaintiffs, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 11 v. 12 United States of America, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 The United States of America (“Defendant” or “the government”) has filed a 16 partial motion to dismiss pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and (6) of the Federal Rules of Civil 17 Procedure. (Doc. 11.) Plaintiffs have filed a response to the motion and a motion for 18 leave to amend. (Doc. 17.) As set forth below, the Court recommends that the partial 19 motion…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. United States v. Jose Francisco Reyna-Tapia, AKA Jose ReynaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API