Legal Opinion
Conklin v. Medtronic
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided October 19, 2017No. 1 CA-CV 16-0252PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE RAYMOND R. CONKLIN, II, et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. MEDTRONIC, INC., et al., Defendants/Appellees. No. 1 CA-CV 16-0252 FILED 10-19-2017 Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County No. CV2015-002965 The Honorable Lori Horn Bustamante, Judge AFFIRMED IN PART; VACATED IN PART; REMANDED COUNSEL O’Steen & Harrison, PLC, Phoenix By Paul D. Friedman, Jonathan V. O’Steen Counsel for Plaintiffs/Appellants Maslon LLP, Minneapolis, MN By Michael C. McCarthy, Erica A. Holzer Pro Hac Vice Co-Counsel for Defendants/Appellees Greenberg Traurig, LLP,…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Arizona v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- In Re Medtronic, Inc., Sprint Fidelis LeadsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Conklin Et Ux v. Medtronic IncArizona Supreme Court · 2018