Legal Opinion

People v. Boulad

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 16, 1965No. Crim. 8955PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

— The defendant Boulad and Bruce Terry Coggeshall were accused of the crime of robbery. Coggeshall pleaded guilty to the offense of robbery of the second degree. In a nonjury trial the defendant Boulad was found guilty of robbery of the second degree. He has appealed from the judgment.

At the trial it was stipulated that the People’s case would be submitted upon the transcript of the testimony taken at the preliminary hearing, the People and the defendant each reserving the right to present additional testimony.

Dick Gordon testified that he was the store manager of Dale’s Pood Market…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. People v. DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  4. People v. HilleryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  5. People v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. People v. TerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. People v. TerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. People v. KetchelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. People v. BowmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. People v. MontgomeryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API