Fortenbury v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
Upon application of the petitioner, this court issued a writ of certiorari for the purpose of reviewing a judgment in which he was held guilty of contempt of court for violating a temporary restraining order prohibiting picketing in connection with a labor dispute. Admittedly, he continued picketing after service of the order upon him. But he contends that as any restraint upon peaceful picketing is a violation of constitutional right, he committed no contempt of court.
There is no dispute concerning the facts upon which the restraining order was issued. They are fully alleged in the petition…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McKay v. Retail Automobile Salesmen's Local Union No. 1067California Supreme Court · 1940
- Goldfinger v. FeintuchNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Texas Co. v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- C. S. Smith Metropolitan Market Co. v. LyonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Rodman v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by96 opinions
- In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Neal v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- J'Aire Corp. v. GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- James v. Marinship Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
- In re BerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.