Legal Opinion

Gerrior v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 11, 1924No. Civ. No. 2912PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

This is an original application for a writ of prohibition to restrain the respondents from trying a certain action wherein the petitioner is plaintiff and one T. A. Clark is defendant. As the writ applied for implies, the ground of the application is that the respondents are without jurisdiction to try the action. The contention is that upon the taking of the appeal no undertaking thereon was filed as required by section 978 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

The facts stated in the petition are not traversed and stand here undisputed. They are, indeed, admitted by the general demurrer interposed…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Traders' National Bank v. SchorrWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Schurtz v. RomerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. In re Estate of HeydenfeldtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Pacific Paving Co. v. BoltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Cohen v. ConnickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hogan v. Locke PaddonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  2. Oliver Aresti v. SotoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1940
  3. Oliver Aresti v. SotoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API