In re Estate of Heydenfeldt
California Supreme Court
MOTION to dismiss an appeal from three orders of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. J. V. Coffey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.
This cause is now before us on a motion to dismiss the appeal of Henrietta Heydenfeldt, upon the ground that said appeal was taken from three separate and distinct orders, and that only one undertaking on said appeal has been given and filed by said appellant.
The motion of appeal states that the appellant appeals “from each of the orders given and made herein granting the petitions of Zeila 0. Hellings for payment of mortgage, and particularly from the order or decree heretofore, on or about June 1, 1896, filed herein, directing the redemption and exoneration of mortgaged premises upon the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. CenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Hastings v. HalleckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- McCobmick v. BelvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Home & Loan Associates v. WilkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Corcoran v. DesmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Creek v. Bozeman Water Works Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1899
- Mitchell v. California & Oregon Steamship Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Berryman v. DoreIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
- Jarman v. ReaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Little v. ThatcherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.