Cohen v. Connick
California Court of Appeal
APPLICATION originally made in the District Court of Appeal for the Third Appellate District to prohibit the Superior Court of Humboldt County from proceeding with the trial of an action on appeal from a justice’s court. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. John H. Dufur, and Henry L. Ford, for Petitioner. Pierce H. Ryan, for Respondents.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
Petitioner seeks to prohibit the lower court from proceeding with the trial of the case of Cohen v. Blum, on appeal from the justice court of Eureka township.
In response to the alternative writ heretofore issued out of this court, respondents have filed a demurrer and an answer, the latter containing a transcript of the testimony at the hearing, by the said superior court, of the motion made therein by petitioner to dismiss the appeal, and also some other exhibits. There is no controversy as to the facts and it is stipulated that all the documents filed herein may be considered in determining…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Moyle v. LandersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Hall v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- California Navigation & Improvement Co. v. Union Transportation Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
- Edwards v. Superior Court, in & for the Cty. of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ex Rel. Williams v. District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1925
- Oliver Aresti v. SotoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1940
- Gerrior v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Williams v. Citizens Utilities Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1963
- Brownell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.