Legal Opinion

Hogan v. Locke Paddon

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 5, 1928No. Docket No. 3501PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMISON, J., pro tem.

This was an action brought by appellant, Walter L. Hogan, in which 'interveners joined, to vacate a certain judgment theretofore rendered against plaintiff and Charles L. Páddon and to restrain respondents from the enforcement of said judgment and to vacate a certain judgment rendered against interveners and to restrain the enforcement of said last-named judgment.

The facts leading up to the bringing of this action are as follows:

On November 3, 1922, in a certain action then pending, wherein Una Margaret Locke Paddon was plaintiff and William Locke Paddon was defendant,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Sharon v. SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Gray v. CottonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. McCallion v. Hibernia Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Crane Co. v. Pacific Heat & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Bross v. McNicholasOregon Supreme Court · 1913

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Merritt v. J. A. Stafford Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
  2. In Re Marriage of HorowitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. Charles F. Harper Co. v. DeWitt Mortgage & Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Eisendrath v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. American Contractors Indemnity Co. v. SaladinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API