Legal Opinion
Reynolds Metals Company, a Corporation, and Henry W. Shoemaker v. I. B. Wand and Alice R. Wand
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 1, 1962No. 17488PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POPE, Circuit Judge.
The appellees-plaintiffs filed a complaint against the appellants in the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon describing the complaint as one for “damages for trespass and nuisance”. Thereafter the cause was removed on the petition of appellants-defendants to the above named District Court of the United States.
The complaint alleged that during the period beginning May 1, 1957, and continuing until the commencement of the action, which was on July 13, 1959, the defendants, in the operation of a certain manufacturing establishment near Trout-dale, Oregon, invaded the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Spaulding v. CameronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Slater v. Shell Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1943
- Razzano v. KentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Bainbridge Power Co. v. IveyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
- Booth-Kelly Lumber Co. v. EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1913
3Cited by8 opinions
- Jacques v. Pioneer Plastics, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Barci v. Intalco Aluminum Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1974
- Provident Mutual Life Insurance v. City of AtlantaDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1994
- Renken v. Harvey Aluminum (Incorporated)District Court, D. Oregon · 1963
- Cook v. Rockwell International Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.