Legal Opinion

Bainbridge Power Co. v. Ivey

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 18, 1930No. 19783PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. A permanent nuisance is not necessarily one which can never, under any circumstances, bo abated; but it is one whose character is such that, from its nature and under the circumstances of its existence, it presumably will continue indefinitely. 46 C. J. 650; C. C. C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. King, 23 Ind. App. 573 (55 N. E. 875); Bischof v. Merchants National Bank, 75 Neb. 838, 5 L. R. A. (N. S.) 486 (106 N. W. 996); N. & W. Ry. Co. v. Allen, 118 Va. 428 (87 S. E. 558, 560); Irvine v. City of Oelwein, 170 Iowa, 653 (L. R. A. 1916 E. 990, 150 N. W. 674); Cumberland Torpedo Co. v. Gaines, 201 Ky.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Langley v. City CouncilSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. MiltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  3. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of Virginia · 1915
  4. Central Georgia Power Co. v. StubbsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  5. Irvine v. City of OelweinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1915

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cox v. Cambridge Square Towne Houses, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  2. Provident Mutual Life Insurance v. City of AtlantaDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1994
  3. Oglethorpe Power Corp. v. ForristerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
  4. Williams v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  5. Reynolds Metals Company, a Corporation, and Henry W. Shoemaker v. I. B. Wand and Alice R. WandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API