Legal Opinion
Renken v. Harvey Aluminum (Incorporated)
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided December 23, 1963No. Civ. 61-207PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KILKENNY, District Judge.
Each of the plaintiffs, since 1958, and in many instances prior to that year, has been in continuous possession of land in Wasco County, Oregon, which land was and is used principally for agricultural and horticultural purposes, in growing and production, for home and commercial purposes, of certain fruit consisting of cherries, prunes, peaches and apricots.
Plaintiffs seek to enjoin the defendant from operating its plant in such a manner as to permit the escape therefrom of excessive quantities of the element, fluorine, which is carried by air currents to plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Cabell v. City of Cottage GroveOregon Supreme Court · 1942
- MARTIN ET UX v. Reynolds Metals Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Clarke E. Davenport v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Association and Continental Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Anderson v. Miami Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1911
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Norvell v. Arizona Public Service Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
- Lunda v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Potomac Passengers Ass'n v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Orchard View Farms, Inc. v. Martin Marietta Aluminum, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 1980
- Potomac Passengers Association v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company and Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company. National Association of Railroad Passengers v. Central of Georgia Railway Company, Southern Railway Company and National Railroad Passenger CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.