Legal Opinion

Slater v. Shell Oil Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 28, 1943No. Civ. 12305PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

Plaintiff sued in ejectment to enforce the removal of defendant’s pipe line from the property of plaintiff, and for damages for the use and occupation of the land. The defendant answered and pleaded two separate defenses—that a former action between the same parties and upon the same subject matter bars this action, and that all damages for the use and occupation of plaintiff’s land having been paid for by the satisfaction of the former judgment, plaintiff is barred from seeking further relief in this action for the same injury.

Under the provisions of section 597 of the Code of Civil…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Panos v. Great Western Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Sutphin v. SpeikCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Great Falls Manufacturing Co. v. Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Oliver v. Monona CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  5. Tooker v. Missouri Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1935

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Busick v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Spaulding v. CameronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Zaslow v. KroenertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Kornoff v. Kingsburg Cotton Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Davis v. WestphalMontana Supreme Court · 2017

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API