Legal Opinion
Subsequent Injury Fund v. Trevethan
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided February 14, 1991No. 90CA0014, 90CA0120 and 90CA0121PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge KELLY * .
In these consolidated cases, the Subsequent Injury Fund (Fund) seeks review of the final order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Office (Panel) ruling that the Fund is liable for interest on compensation in excess of $10,000 awarded to the three claimants. We affirm.
The applicable version of § 8-52-109(2), C.R.S. (1986 Repl.Vol. 3B) provides that: “Every employer or insurance carrier of an employer shall pay interest at the rate of eight percent per annum upon all sums not paid upon the date fixed by the award of the director for the payment thereof.” The Fund argues…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Travelers Insurance Co. v. SavioSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- Colorado Department of Social Services v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- Allee v. Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. BacaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Union Carbide Corp. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Henderson v. RSI, INC.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1991
- People v. GreymountainColorado Court of Appeals · 1997
- Subsequent Injury Fund v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1994
- Subsequent Injury Fund v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of ColoradoColorado Court of Appeals · 1994
- No., Colorado Attorney General Reports1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.