Legal Opinion

No.

Colorado Attorney General Reports

Decided April 18, 1995Published

1Opinion of the Court

QUESTION PRESENTED AND CONCLUSION

ISSUE: Does the General Assembly's proposed transfer of funds from the general fund into the capital construction fund for highway construction violates either the Arveschoug-Bird limitation on general fund appropriations or is a "weakening" of "other limits on district revenue, spending, and debt" prohibited by Amendment #1 ("TABOR").

ANSWER: No. The General Assembly's proposed transfer of funds from the general fund into the capital construction fund does not violate the Arveschoug-Bird limitation on general fund appropriations and is not a "weakening" of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Village of Westbury v. Department of TransportationNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Robles v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  3. Karcher v. KeanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  4. State Ex Rel. Kauer v. DefenbacherOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Blue River Defense Com. v. Town of SilverthorneColorado Court of Appeals · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API