Legal Opinion

People v. Greymountain

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided August 21, 1997No. 96CA0371PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge NEY.

Defendant, Ernest Greymountain, appeals from the trial court’s order denying his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Crim. P. 35(a) and 35(c). Defendant argues that his 16-year sentence is unlawful because it exceeds the maximum sentence permitted under § 16-11-309, C.R.S. (1996 Cum.Supp.). We affirm.

Defendant pled guilty to second degree assault, a class four felony. This offense implicates the “crime of violence” statute, as provided by § 16-11-309, as well as the “extraordinary risk of harm” provisions of § 18-1-105(9.7), C.R.S. (1996 Cum.Supp.).

Defendant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Highway Commission of Colorado v. HaaseSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  2. Rocky Mountain General v. SimonColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Subsequent Injury Fund v. TrevethanColorado Court of Appeals · 1991

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. William J. Hunsaker, Jr. v. The People of the State of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 2021
  2. People v. MataColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. People v. LahrColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. People v. DanielsColorado Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. People v. OrtegaColorado Court of Appeals · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API