Legal Opinion

Subsequent Injury Fund v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of Colorado

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided September 22, 1994No. 93CA1786PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge METZGER.

The Subsequent Injury Fund (SIF) seeks review of a final order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Office (Panel) which affirmed a retroactive increase in disability benefits for the occupational disease suffered by Clarence Reed (claimant). We affirm.

In 1988, claimant became permanently disabled by silicosis, an occupational disease. His award of benefits was based on his 1962 wages, that being the time of his last injurious exposure leading to the disease. After the decision in Henderson v. RSI, Inc., 824 P.2d 91 (Colo.App.1991) was announced, the claimant was allowed to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Henderson v. RSI, INC.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. L.E.L. Construction v. GoodeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  4. Romero v. Standard Metals CorporationColorado Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Loffland Bros. Co. v. Industrial Claim Appeals PanelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Colorado Springs v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API