Legal Opinion
Subsequent Injury Fund v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided December 1, 1994No. 93CA2090PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge CRISWELL.
The Subsequent Injury Fund (Fund) seeks review of the final order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Office (Panel) finding the Fund liable for interest on compensation awarded to claimant prior to July 8, 1992. We affirm.
Claimant filed a claim in April 1992 for workers’ compensation benefits. Following a hearing, the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) found that claimant had become permanently and totally disabled in August 1982, although the occupational cause of his disability, asbestosis, was not discovered until February 1991. The ALJ determined that claimant was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of Boulder v. PayneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
- Henderson v. RSI, INC.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1991
- Myers v. Carr Const. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Subsequent Injury Fund v. TrevethanColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
- Mendisco & Urralbura Mining Co. v. JohnsonColorado Court of Appeals · 1984
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ortiz v. Charles J. Murphy & Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1998
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Industrial Claims OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
- WAL-MART STORES, INC., and Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania v. The INDUSTRIAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO and Danielle M. GrigsbyColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
- WAL-MART STORES, INC., and Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania v. The INDUSTRIAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO and Danielle M. GrigsbyColorado Court of Appeals · 1999