American Railway Express Co. v. Houle
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, J.
Defendants are husband and wife. The husband was in the employ of plaintiff from November, 1919, to October, 1923. In April, 1920, the husband purchased certain land described as the south two-thirds of block 7, Haussner’s addition to the village of White Bear, paying therefor from his own funds the sum of $925 and taking the title thereto in the name of himself and his wife, Josephine Houle, as tenants in common. While so in the employ of plaintiff the husband, from time to time, unlawfully and fraudulently commingled money in his possession belonging to the plaintiff with his own funds and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Truelsch v. MillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
- Long v. MurphySupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
- Kaser v. HaasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- Shearer v. BarnesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In Re the Marriage of AllenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Long v. EarleMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Denzer v. PrendergastSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Sou-Hsiung Jack CHIU, Appellant, v. Amy Kam-Ling WONG, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Thompson v. NesheimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.