Long v. Murphy
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Chautauqua District Court. Action brought by Adam Long and- John Long, partners as Long Brothers, against Murphy, to recover upon a certain promissory note. The nature of the action, and the facts, appear in the opinion. Of certain orders made by the district judge November 26, 1881, the plaintiffs complain, and have brought the case here.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
On the 2d day of July, 1881, plaintiffs in error commenced an action against C. D. Murphy, one of the defendants in error, to recover upon a promissory note executed March 29, 1881, for $385.83, due sixty days after date, with interest at the rate of ten per cent, per annum. At the commencement of the action, plaintiffs obtained an order of attachment against the property of the said defendant Murphy, and on July 5, 1881, no goods or chattels of the said defendant being found, the order was levied upon the east half of the northeast…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- White-Crow v. White-WingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1865
- Harrison v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
- Pratt v. BurrU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Wisconsin · 1857
3Cited by30 opinions
- First American Title Insurance v. Lett (In Re Lett)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 1999
- Ballew v. YoungSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Watson v. BonfilsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
- American Railway Express Co. v. HouleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Exchange State Bank v. PoindexterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.