Kaser v. Haas
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Plaintiff, being the owner of a certain lot in the city of St. Paul, brought this action in the district court for Eamsey county to restrain the defendant from selling the same under a certain judgment, and to have the said judgment declared to be no lien upon said lot.
Read the full summary
Plaintiff, being the owner of a certain lot in the city of St. Paul, brought this action in the district court for Eamsey county to restrain the defendant from selling the same under a certain judgment, and to have the said judgment declared to be no lien upon said lot. Upon the trial of the action before Brill, J., the court found as facts that prior to January 11, 1878,' one George Willig was the owner of an undivided three-fourths of said lot, and occupied the same as his homestead; that on January 11, 1875, the defendant recovered judgment against said Willig, and had the same duly…
1Opinion of the CourtGilfillan, C. J.
When defendant’s judgment against George Willig was docketed, the latter was occupying as his home and owned an undivided three-fourths of the lot in question — lot 3, block 2, Brunson’s addition to St. Paul. After the docketing he removed from the lot, and never after-wards resided on it, but, within six months from his removing, he duly made and filed notice, as provided by law, of his claim of the lot as his homestead. Within a year after removing, the outstanding undivided one-fourth interest was conveyed to him, and afterwards, within said, year, he conveyed the lot to plaintiff.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wilder v. HaugheySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874
- Spencer v. GeissmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Ward v. George Huhn & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1870
3Cited by24 opinions
- Denzer v. PrendergastSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Brokaw v. OgleIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
- In Re Quentin B. Stenzel, Debtor. Peoples' State Bank of Wells v. Quentin B. StenzelCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- Keith v. AlbrechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- American Railway Express Co. v. HouleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.