Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Denzer v. Prendergast

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 17, 1964No. 38,696PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sheran, Justice.

Appeal from an order of the district court denying a blended motion for amended findings or for a new trial.

Action was instituted by Floyd Denzer for the purpose of obtaining-a judicial determination that a described 80-acre tract of real estate located in rural Le Sueur County, Minnesota, is exempt from seizure or sale under legal process on account of judgments in favor of defend ants Michael E. Prendergast and Loretta Prendergast entered January 12, 1961, and based on verdicts for damages caused by an automobile accident found to have resulted proximately from the…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Wilder v. HaugheySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874
  2. Beliveau v. BeliveauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  3. Dimke v. FinkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  4. Hurd v. HurdSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  5. Olson v. DahlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. In Re HaggertySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. Cargill, Inc. v. HedgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. In Re Steven L. Peterson and Judith A. Peterson, Debtors. Mark C. Halverson, Panel Trustee v. Steven L. Peterson and Judith A. PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  4. Burrows v. BurrowsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  5. In Re CochraneUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1995

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API