Truelsch v. Miller
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed January 13, 1925:
Jones, J.
The views of the referee and the trial judge as to the legal questions involved present a striking contrast. The trial court held that Paul was a mere employee and in no sense a trustee; that the letters and books of the company offered were mere hearsay; that the title to the policies became at once vested in the plaintiff under the statutes and could not be divested except by surrender and indorsement.
In treating the letters as pure hearsay the court disregarded an important exception to the rule excluding hearsay evidence which has…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Holmes v. . GilmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Wojahn v. National Union Bank of OshkoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
- Rawson v. Milwaukee Mutual Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
- Von Trott v. Von TrottWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- Maine v. Maryland Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Wolfle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Pence v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Prince v. BryantWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Richards v. RichardsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- In Re Trust Under Will of HoldenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.