Legal Opinion

Medico-Dental Building Co. v. Horton & Converse

California Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1942No. L. A. 18387PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

— Plaintiff brought this suit for rent alleged to be due under a lease, for the amount of an electricity charge against defendant during the last month of its occupancy of the premises, and for money expended for renovation following the defendant’s removal. A trial was had before the court without a jury, and findings were made in favor of the defendant pursuant to its claim that plaintiff’s breach of a restrictive covenant in the lease, which violation was not waived by the defendant, prevented the maintenance of this action except as to the expenditure for electricity as alleged in the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Jacob & Youngs, Inc. v. KentNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Showalter v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Hamilton v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Kautz v. Zurich General Accident & Liability InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Arnold v. KrigbaumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Fantasy, Inc. v. FogertyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  2. Green v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Javins v. First National Realty Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  4. Spinks v. Equity Residential Briarwood ApartmentsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Kendall v. Ernest Pestana, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API