Felton v. Millard
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court rendered in Department Two.
1Opinion of the Court
The Court.
Upon due consideration, after argument on rehearing, we adhere to our former opinion; and for reasons therein given, the judgment and order are affirmed.
The following is the opinion above referred to, rendered in Department Two on the 22d of April, 1889: —
McFarland, J.
This is an action of unlawful detainer. The verdict and judgment were for plaintiff. Defendant appeals from the judgment, and from an order denying a new trial.
1. Counsel for appellant argues very strenuously and *541ingeniously that the evidence was not sufficient to establish the existence of a lease between plaintiff…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fish v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Mason v. WolffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Reay v. CotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
3Cited by22 opinions
- Arnold v. KrigbaumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Goldstone v. Merchants' Ice & Cold Storage Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
- Later v. HaywoodIdaho Supreme Court · 1906
- Bliss v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Zilmer v. GerichtenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.