Truesdale v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by Philadelphia Trust, Safe-Deposit and Insurance Company and other defendants from an. order of the district court for Hennepin county, Jamison, J., denying a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
Prior to the year 1888, the Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Company executed and issued its bonds to the amount of $1,100,000, secured by its trust deed, to the defendant the Farmers’ Loan & Trust Company. The bonds were negotiable, passing from hand to hand, and some of them are now owned by the defendants in this action who have taken this appeal. In 1888 certain litigation was instituted by Henry Seibert against the railroad company, in which it was sought to force a foreclosure of the trust deed or mortgage above *456mentioned. The Farmers’ Loan & Trust Company was made a defendant in that…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Riggs v. . PursellNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Dwight v. . St. JohnNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- Heidel v. BenedictSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Truesdale v. Philadelphia Trust, Safe Deposit & InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Seibert v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Lummus Company v. Commonwealth Oil Refining Company, Inc., Lummus Company v. Honorable Archie O. DawsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Arnold v. KrigbaumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Johnson v. United Railways Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1912
- Karst v. SellerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Halvorsen v. Orinoco Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.