Legal Opinion
City of Phoenix v. Burke
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided April 3, 1969No. 1 CA-CIV 630PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DONOFRIO, Chief Judge.
On October 28, 1965, a rezoning application was filed with the City of Phoenix Planning Department requesting that certain property be rezoned from Rl-6 to to R-3. Rl-6 means that under the Phoenix Zoning Ordinance the property can only be developed for single-family residences on lots of 6000 sq. ft. or larger. R-3 is *396the zoning classification ' for development of multiple-family residences on lots with a’ minimum of 6000 sq. ft. and with no more than one dwelling unit and customary accessory buildings for each 3000 sq. ft. of lot area.
The application was heard by the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Tovrea Land and Cattle Company v. LinsenmeyerArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Johnston v. City of ClaremontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Hamer v. Town of RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- City of Tucson v. Arizona MortuaryArizona Supreme Court · 1928
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Dietel v. DayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Navajo Freight Lines, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
- Chapman v. FieldArizona Supreme Court · 1979
- Mecham v. United Bank of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1971
- Wait v. City of ScottsdaleArizona Supreme Court · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.