Legal Opinion
City of Tucson v. Arizona Mortuary
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided December 17, 1928No. Civil No. 2715PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.
Arizona Mortuary, a corporation, hereinafter called plaintiff, brought suit against the City of Tucson, a municipal corporation, hereinafter called defendant, to enjoin the latter from enforcing the provisions of Ordinance 600 of the City of Tucson, which regulates the location of mortuaries. The trial court granted the injunction, and from the decision of that court this appeal has been taken.
The facts of the ease aré as follows: On the twelfth day of May, 1926, there was no ordinance in the City of Tucson regulating the location of mortuaries. All existing establishments of that nature were…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Hadacheck v. SebastianSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Nectow v. City of CambridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Dobbins v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Thomas Cusack Co. v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Speyer v. BarryDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Kiges v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Piper v. MeredithSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
- Spindler Realty Corp. v. MonningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Marshall v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.