Legal Opinion
Wait v. City of Scottsdale
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided September 23, 1980No. 14686PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLOHAN, Vice Chief Justice.
■After a trial to the court, judgment was entered in favor of the defendants, the City of Scottsdale and others denying the relief sought by the plaintiffs to obtain a rezoning of their property. A timely appeal was filed. We took jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 19(e), Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, 17A A.R.S.
The essential facts are that Robert and Gloria Little entered into an agreement with Dr. Charles Wait and others to sell their five-acre parcel of land located adjacent to Scottsdale Road approximately one-half mile south of Shea Boulevard. The…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- City of Eastlake v. Forest City Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Radice v. People of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Ellick v. Bd. of Spvrs., Worcester Twp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Throop v. FE Young and CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- City of Tucson v. Arizona MortuaryArizona Supreme Court · 1928
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. JonesArizona Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. DoerrArizona Supreme Court · 1998
- Pioneer Trust Co. v. Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- Emmett McLoughlin Realty, Inc. v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Redelsperger v. City of AvondaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.