Chapman v. Field
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CAMERON, Chief Justice.
This is a consolidated appeal by parties to a judgment of the trial court which held that the buyers, Richard and Bonnie Cantin, husband and wife, and Roger and Lois Field, husband and wife, were not the alter egos of the Andrew Investment Corporation, and that the sellers, Fullmer and La-Donna Chapman, husband and wife, Gordon and Verdene Chapman, husband and wife, and Wayne and Betty Martin, husband and wife, were entitled to judgment against the Andrew Investment Corporation. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 19(e), Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, 17A…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. BeardenArizona Supreme Court · 1965
- Dietel v. DayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Bank of Gering v. GloverNebraska Supreme Court · 1974
- Vic Hansen & Sons, Inc. v. CrowleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Barker v. HornSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Wilmington Trust Co. v. ConnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
- Standage v. StandageCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- Wippert v. Blackfeet Tribe of the Blackfeet Indian ReservationMontana Supreme Court · 1985
- First Bank of South Dakota v. Haberer Dairy & Farm Equipment, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Cottam v. HeppnerUtah Supreme Court · 1989
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.