Hamer v. Town of Ross
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.
While zoning ordinances which impose a one-acre lot restriction cannot properly apply to property which is virtually surrounded by parcels of lesser size, they may, conversely, restrict the use of the property to a single-family dwelling because that usage is the predominant characteristic of the property in the general area. Applying the accepted test that we will uphold such a regulation if its reasonableness is fairly debatable, we sustain the single-family restriction. We further hold that the ordinances may severably be enforced as to the single-family restriction although not as to the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Dowsey v. Village of KensingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Sinclair Pipe Line Co. v. Village of Richton ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
- Lockard v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Zahn v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Associated Home Builders of Greater Eastbay, Inc. v. City of LivermoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Calfarm Insurance v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Agricultural Labor Relations Board v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- HFH, LTD. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.