Legal Opinion
United States v. Peterson
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided September 29, 1997No. 96-1376; Crim.App. No. 9600323PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
COX, Chief Judge:
Pursuant to his pleas, appellant was convicted of housebreaking and indecent assault, violations of Articles 130 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC §§ 930 and 934, respectively.* We granted review of appellant’s question as to whether the military judge sufficiently resolved a possible inconsistency between appellant’s pleas and statements elicited during his providence inquiry and on sentencing.
Facts
The incident underlying appellant’s conviction took place in the early morning hours of December 22, 1995. Appellant and his female victim were…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. PraterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
- United States v. GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
- United States v. PenisterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
- United States v. DockUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
- United States v. AndersonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- United States v. DiPaolaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
- United States v. ConliffeCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2009
- United States v. BinegarCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2001
- United States v. NewArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 1999
- United States v. ReesU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 1998
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.