Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Conliffe

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided January 7, 2009No. 08-0158/ARPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge BAKER

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Appellant entered guilty pleas before a military judge sitting as a general court-martial at West Point, New York. Following the providence inquiry, the military judge accepted Appellant’s pleas and found Appellant guilty of three specifications of housebreaking, five specifications of conduct unbecoming an officer and a gentleman, and “intentionally us[ing] an image recording device for the purpose of videotaping the sexual conduct of [another] without her consent,” in violation of Articles 130, 133, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. PraterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  2. United States v. InabinetteCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
  3. United States v. MedinaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
  4. United States v. DavisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  5. United States v. GiordanoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. AshbyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2009
  2. United States v. LoftonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2011
  3. United States v. DiazCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010
  4. United States v. McMurrinNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2010
  5. United States v. ContrerasCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API