Legal Opinion
McClintock v. Gleason
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 24, 1938No. 8441PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR, Circuit Judge.
The appeal is upon an agreed statement on appeal pursuant to Equity Rule 77, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723, in which it is stated that the principal questions on appeal are:
“1. Is the device described in plaintiff’s U. S. Patent No. 1,929,366 anticipated by the prior art?
“2. Do plaintiff’s Exhibits T-l and T — 2 infringe patent in suit?
“3. If (1) above is answered in the negative, and (2) above in the affirmative, is defendant H. E. Pearson guilty of infringement ?”
On July 1, 1935, appellant filed a bill of complaint alleging ownership of letters patent No. 1,929,366…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hubbell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Computing Scale Co. of America v. Automatic Scale Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Toledo, P. C. & L. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
- Elliott & Co. v. Youngstown Car Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1910
- Stoody Co. v. Mills Alloys, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jacuzzi Bros. Inc. v. Berkeley Pump Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
- Jaybee Manufacturing Corporation v. Ajax Hardware Manufacturing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
- Rohr Aircraft Corp. v. Rubber Teck, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Gomez v. Granat Bros.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Lage v. Caldwell Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.