Legal Opinion
Rohr Aircraft Corp. v. Rubber Teck, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 21, 1959No. 15884PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMLIN, Circuit Judge.
Rohr Aircraft Corporation and The Franklin C. Wolfe Company, Inc., filed an action in the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of California for a patent infringement and unfair competition against Rubber Teck, Inc., and others. All of the defendants denied the charges, and certain of the defendants, to-wit, Paul A. Karres, Otto R. Grass, and Joe P. Kerley, filed a counterclaim against the plaintiffs for false marking.
The District Court entered judgment dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint and defendants’ counterclaim, holding that the patent in suit…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Canal Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Maternally Yours, Inc. v. Your Maternity Shop, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours Powder Co. v. MaslandSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Griffith Rubber Mills, a Corporation v. Henry S. HoffarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Merry Hull & Company v. Hi-Line Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- Miles Laboratories, Inc. v. FrolichDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1961
- Bada Co. v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Henry J. Kaiser Company v. McLouth Steel Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1966
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.