Legal Opinion
Gomez v. Granat Bros.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 20, 1949No. 12160PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Circuit Judge.
This action was originally commenced by appellants against appellees under Section 274d of the Judicial Code, 28 U.S.C.A. § 400, 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 2201, 2202, for a declaratory judgment establishing the invalidity of the Granat Patent No. 2,059,228: Defendants filed a cross complaint charging infringement of the patent in suit. On trial the court determined the issues in favor of defendants, found the patent valid and infringed, and entered judgment dismissing the complaint and enjoining plaintiffs from manufacturing and selling the infringing device. Plaintiffs have…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Hotchkiss v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Marconi Wireless Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Marconi Wireless Telegraph Company of America v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Wham-O-Mfg. Co., a Corporation v. Paradise Manufacturing Co., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Kemart Corp. v. Printing Arts Research Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- Robert W. Brown & Co., Inc., Robert W. Brown and Olive W. Brown v. Leonard De Bell (Substituted for United States License Frame Mfg. Co.)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Chisholm-Ryder Co., Inc. v. Lewis Mfg. Co., Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
- Frances P. Syracuse and New Wonder Bag Corporation v. Harry ParisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.