Legal Opinion
Ubysz v. DiPietro
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 28, 1981PublishedCited by 77 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.
The plaintiffs brought this action after the defendant administrator of the decedent’s estate disallowed their proof of claim against the estate. The plaintiffs sought, in the first count of their complaint, a conveyance of the premises located at 96 Belmont Street, New Britain. In the second count, they sought the reasonable value of services rendered. Written interrogatories were submitted to the jury who found in favor of the plaintiffs on the first count of the complaint. Following the denial of his motions to set aside the verdict and for a directed verdict, the defendant has appealed…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Grant v. GrantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
- Siladi v. McNamaraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- DeCarufel v. Colonial Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Gorham v. Farmington Motor Inn, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- DeLuca v. C. W. Blakeslee & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- Schnabel v. Trilegiant Corp. & Affinion, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Dunham v. DunhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Omega Engineering, Inc. v. Omega, S.A., Docket No. 04-5084-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Ford v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Glazer v. Dress Barn, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.