Legal Opinion
Graybill v. Plant
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 11, 1951PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
The defendants appeal from the denial of their motion to set aside the verdict and from the judgment, alleging errors in the charge and rulings on evidence.
The jury could reasonably have found the following basic facts: The plaintiff was graduated from the Bran-ford High School in June, 1930. She stood first in her class in the commercial course and was selected to receive the Rotary Club award for service. During the award presentation ceremonies, the defendants’ decedent, Palmer, who was engaged in the real estate and insurance business in Branford and was an active member of the Rotary…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Grant v. GrantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
- State v. KellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
- Leahy v. CheneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Stephanofsky v. HillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
- Clark v. DiefendorfSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Dacey v. Connecticut Bar Assn.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Ubysz v. DiPietroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Freeman v. Alamo Management Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Dinan v. MarchandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Anderson v. ZweigbaumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.