Legal Opinion

State v. Gargano

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 5, 1923PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

The first reason of appeal alleges that the court erred in denying the defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict. The defendant claims that under the evidence the jury could not reasonably have found that, the guilt of the accused was proved beyond a reasonable doubt.

We have held repeatedly that a verdict should Jbe set aside “‘only when manifest injustice has been done by the verdict, and the. wrong is so plain and palpable as clearly to denote that some mistake was made by the jury in the application of legal principles, or as to justify the suspicion that they, or some of them, were…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. HamlinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1879
  2. State v. RomeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
  3. State v. ScottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907
  4. Vincent v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Asso.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
  5. State v. LeeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. State v. GrahamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  2. O'Dea v. AmodeoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  3. State v. FoordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  4. State v. FosterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  5. State v. GuilfoyleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API