Legal Opinion

Adams v. Schrunk

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 21, 1971PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFort, J.

This is a declaratory judgment proceeding brought by Portland police officers against the city and the board of trustees of its fire and police disability and retirement fund. Plaintiffs seek a declaration that their initial temporary service before permament appointment counts for eligibility for retirement and computation of benefits therefor. The trial court held against them and they appeal.

A chronology of the factual situation follows.

In November 1918, Article 2 of the Portland City Charter was adopted establishing policemen’s disability and survivorship benefits and a retirement fund.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Yeazell v. CopinsArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  2. State Ex Rel. Nilsen v. Oregon State Motor Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Harryman v. Roseburg Rural Fire Protection DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Bellus v. City of EurekaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Crawford v. Teachers' Retirement Fund Ass'n of School District Number 1Oregon Supreme Court · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hughes v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Oregon State Police Officers' Ass'n v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Taylor v. Multnomah County Deputy Sheriff's Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Alderson v. State of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. Williams v. SchrunkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API