Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Multnomah County Deputy Sheriff's Retirement Board

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1973PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolman, J.

Plaintiff brought a mandamus proceeding to force defendants, custodians of the Multnomah County Deputy Sheriff’s Retirement Board, to include plaintiff in the retirement system for sworn law enforcement personnel of the Department of Public Safety. The trial court granted the writ and defendants appealed to the Court of Appeals. That court reversed the trial court and dismissed the application for the writ. 11 Or App 488, 502 P2d 601 (1972). The Supreme Court granted review.

Plaintiff has been employed since 1956 by the Department of Public Safety or its predecessor, the Multnomah County…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kern v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Bakenhus v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Yeazell v. CopinsArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Hanson v. City of Idaho FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Harryman v. Roseburg Rural Fire Protection DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Minidoka Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Hughes v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Oregon State Police Officers' Ass'n v. StateOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Moro v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Rose City Transit Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1975

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API