Legal Opinion

Yeazell v. Copins

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1965No. 7888PublishedCited by 121 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUCKMEYER, Vice Chief Justice.

Appellant Kenneth G. Yeazell, having completed in excess of twenty years of service with the Police Department of the City of Tucson, requested retirement effective May 3, 1962. The Police Pension Board of Tucson retired appellant, fixing the amount as directed by the 1952 amendment to the Police Pension Act of 1937, A.R.S. § 9-923. Appellant brought an original action for declaratory judgment in the superior court asserting that his retirement should be computed in accordance with the 1937 act as it existed at the time he entered the service of the Police…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. American Federation of Labor v. American Sash & Door Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Bakenhus v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Dryden v. Board of Pension CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. O'Dea v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Becker v. FaberNew York Court of Appeals · 1939

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by121 opinions

  1. Van Loan v. Van LoanArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Bayrón Toro v. SerraSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1987
  3. Parker v. WakelinCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
  4. Opinion of the JusticesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  5. Singer v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980

116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API