Williams v. Schrunk
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtFort, J.
Plaintiff, formerly a Portland city policeman, resigned that position. Thereafter, he sought refund of the compulsory contributions deducted from Ms pay and transferred to the Portland Fire and Police Disability and Retirement Fund. Following trial by the court upon the merits, judgment was entered against Mm and he appeals. ①
Plaintiff’s sole assignment of error challenges the constitutionality of the Charter of the City of Portland, ch V, Art 1, § 5-113.
The parties agree that plaintiff became a member of the Portland city police force on August 5,1965, and voluntarily terminated his…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dominion Hotel, Inc. v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Mallatt v. LUIHNOregon Supreme Court · 1956
- Savage v. MartinOregon Supreme Court · 1938
- Taylor v. Multnomah County Deputy Sheriff's Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- CROFT v. LambertOregon Supreme Court · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Conrad v. City of ThorntonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
- Sandell v. Saint Paul Police Relief Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Oregon State Homebuilders Ass'n v. City of TigardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- Shaffer v. City of WinstonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- State v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.