Legal Opinion
Warren v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided February 15, 2007No. Civil Action 05-cv-01891-EWN-MEHPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
NOTTINGHAM, District Judge.
This is an insurance case. Plaintiffs Kirk and Kurt Warren allege that by failing to disclose, offer, and provide certain personal injury protection (“PIP”) coverage to Deborah Bannister and Kurt Warren (the “Insureds”), Defendant Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company: (1) violated the Colorado Auto Accident Reparations Act (“CAARA”), specifically Colorado Revised Statutes sections 10-4-710(2)(a), 10-4-706(4)(a), and 10-4-111; (2) breached their insurance contract; (3) breached their insurance contracts in statutory and common law bad…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Argo v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- World of Sleep, Inc. v. La-Z-Boy Chair Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. SinclairCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Warren v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2010
- Warren v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009