Legal Opinion
United States v. Sinclair
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 26, 1997No. 96-5040PublishedCited by 109 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HENRY, Circuit Judge.
Michael Paul Dale Sinclair was convicted after a jury trial of knowingly making a false declaration before the court in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1623 and of conspiracy to commit an offense against the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. He argues that the district court: (1) erred in denying his motion for a new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence; (2) made inadequate findings before admitting out-of-court statements of his alleged eoeonspirators; (3) erred in admitting the testimony of witnesses who lacked personal knowledge; (4) improperly limited…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Delaware v. FenstererSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Donald James and David Anthony Butler, United States of America v. Henry Smith and Kenneth Wayne WhitmoreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Larrison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1928
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by109 opinions
- Argo v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. SummersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- UNITED STATES of America, v. Frank SERAFINI; United States of America, v. Frank SerafiniCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Darryl Lamont JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Bui v. DiPaoloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.