Legal Opinion

Warren v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 11, 2009No. 07-1482PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’BRIEN, Circuit Judge.

Kirk and Kurt Warren (collectively “Appellants”), twin brothers injured in an automobile accident, appeal from the district court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company (“Liberty Mutual”). They allege they are entitled to reformation of the insurance policy purchased by Kurt Warren and his purported wife, Deborah Bannister (n/k/a Deborah Warren), because Liberty Mutual’s offer of extended or additional personal injury protection (“extended PIP” or “APIP”) benefits violated the Colorado Auto Accident Reparations Act (“CAARA”),…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Osgood v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  2. Habecker v. Town of Estes Park, Colo.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  3. Allstate Insurance Co. v. ParfreySupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  4. Blanke v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
  5. Stickley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cardenas v. Financial Indemnity Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. Warren v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2010
  3. Davis v. Guideone Mutual Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API