Legal Opinion
World of Sleep, Inc. v. La-Z-Boy Chair Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 4, 1985No. Nos. 82-1694, 82-1818PublishedCited by 195 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
In this antitrust action, plaintiff World of Sleep, Inc. alleged that defendants La-Z-Boy Chair Company, Montgomery Ward & Co., and Art Mauldin d/b/a La-Z-Boy Showcase Shoppe had conspired to maintain the retail price of La-Z-Boy chairs in violation of section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1 (1982). The district court granted summary judgment for Mauldin, finding no admissible evidence linking him to the alleged conspiracy. After a four week trial, the jury found in favor of the remaining defendants on this claim.
World of Sleep also alleged that La-Z-Boy had…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by195 opinions
- Rutman Wine Company v. E. & J. Gallo WineryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Cayman Exploration Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. United Gas Pipe Line Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Brown v. ReardonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- Westman Commission Company, Cross-Appellant v. Hobart International, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- Alan's of Atlanta, Inc. v. Minolta Corporation, Robert Lathrop, Wolf Camera, Inc., and Charles WolfCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
190 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.