Legal Opinion

Garrick v. J. M. P., Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 18, 1957No. Civ. 21855PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.

Defendants J.M.P., Inc. and Cecil D. Pruitt appeal from a judgment rendered against them upon a promissory note for $19,500 which the court found to have been issued by the corporation to Pruitt without consideration, later purchased by plaintiff for $15,000 in good faith, before maturity and without notice of any infirmity therein. Their major defense of usury was rejected. The primary question upon appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the findings. In stating the facts we shall accept, in accordance with the familiar rule of appellate review, all testimony and inferences…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. People v. HustonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Nichols v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Stickel v. San Diego Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1948

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Moe v. Transamerica Title InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. Janisse v. Winston Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. Gem-Valley Ranches, Inc. v. SmallIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Brautigam v. BrooksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Ury v. Jewelers Acceptance Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API