Legal Opinion
Ury v. Jewelers Acceptance Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 30, 1964No. Civ. 21103PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDevine, J.
Appellants are Walter Ury, individually and as sole general partner of Woulf & Ury Jewelers, and Woulf & Ury, Inc., a corporation, residents of the State of California; respondents are Jewelers Acceptance Corporation and SEC Acceptance Corporation, residents of the State of New York, and two representatives of the companies. Appellants, plaintiffs, seek declaratory relief, rescission or reformation of a contract, and penalties, all on the ground that the contract is usurious. Respondents have counterclaimed for an amount alleged to he due on the contract.
Fads
Mr. Ury was in the retail jewelry…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Auten v. AutenNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Steven v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
- Elias Siegelman, Individually, and as Administrator of the Estate of Eva Siegelman, Deceased v. Cunard White Star LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Jenkins v. MoyseNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Haumschild v. Continental Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Hollingsworth Solderless Terminal Co., a Corporation v. William Turley, an Individual and Hoffman Electronics Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Frame v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1971
- Ashland Chemical Co. v. ProvenceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Gamer v. duPont Glore Forgan, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1976
- Continental Mortg. Investors v. Sailboat Key, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1981
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.