Smith v. Enterprise Irrigation District
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.
By this suit, plaintiffs seek to enjoin defendant, Enterprise Irrigation District, from assessing or levying any further taxes or charges against the real property of plaintiffs situate within said irrigation district, which real property consists of 151 acres described as all of tracts 1 to 26 inclusive of Fair Acres No. 2; said real property being also known as east half of southeast quarter of section 27; west half of southwest quarter of section 26; and northwest quarter of northwest quarter of northeast quarter of section 34, all in township 38 S. R. 9 E. W. M. in Klamath county, Oregon.
P…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Twohy Bros. v. Ochoco Irrigation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Jenison v. RedfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Nissen v. Cordua Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Whitcher v. Bonneville Irr. Dist.Utah Supreme Court · 1927
3Cited by8 opinions
- Aberdeen-Springfield Canal Co. v. PeiperIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
- Dalles Irrigation District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Klamath Irrigation District v. United StatesOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- Department of Ecology v. AcquavellaWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Fort Vannoy Irrigation District v. Water Resources CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.